Kelly speaks at child porn trial, won't testify
Thursday, 06.12.2008, 01:51am (GMT+5.5)CHICAGO (AP) - R. Kelly told the judge in his child pornography trial Tuesday
that he doesn't plan to testify.
After Judge Vincent Gaughan told Kelly
he had a right to not take the stand, the R&B singer leaned forward at the
defense table with his hands folded and, speaking for the first time at the
trial, responded: "I decided not to testify."
The jury wasn't in the room
at the time.
Kelly, 41, has pleaded not guilty to charges that he
videotaped himself having sex with an underage girl. Both Kelly and the alleged
victim, now 23, have denied being on the tape.
Also Tuesday, the judge
ruled that jurors can view the sex tape once they begin
deliberating.
Kelly's lawyers had asked the judge to bar jurors from
reviewing the graphic video, saying they worried jurors would overemphasize one
piece of evidence. But prosecutors argued the tape is the primary subject of the
trial and couldn't be kept from jurors.
"People's Exhibit No. 1 is the
actual nucleus of the case ... the evidence centers around this exhibit," said
prosecutor Shauna Boliker.
Gaughn agreed, but added that he would
instruct the jurors before they begin deliberating that they shouldn't put too
much emphasis on the tape alone.
A prosecution witness also took the
stand for a second time to rebut defense claims about the tape. The defense and
prosecution both have rested their cases but video expert Grant Fredericks'
testimony is part of the prosecution's right of rebuttal.
A version of
the video that the defense used in presenting their case was misleading because
it was such low quality, Fredericks told jurors.
The defense argued that
in their version of the tape there is no mole on the back of the man who
appeared, proving the man is not Kelly, who has such a mole.
But
Fredericks says higher quality versions of the tape clearly show a mole on the
man's back.
The defense and prosecutors also sparred in court Tuesday
about who made certain copies of the tape and whether that may have undermined
the defense's case.
Closing arguments are likely to be delivered
Thursday.





Comments (0)
Print
Tell friend
Top
