Friday, 07.30.2010, 08:13pm (GMT+5.5)
 
  Home
 
  Events
 
  FAQ
 
  RSS
 
  Links
 
  Site Map
 
  Contact
 
HOT NEWS उम्मदवारी फिर्ता लिन माओवादी र कांग्रेसलाई खनालको आग्रह ; इराक जान लगाइएको प्रतिबन्ध फुकुवा, नयाँ प्रक्रिया अघि बढाइने ; प्रधानमन्त्रीमा कुन दललाई समर्थन गर्ने भन्नेबारे मधेसी मोर्चा अन्योलमा ; मञ्चबाट बाहिरिएको समूहबाट नयाँ दल दर्ता ; पूर्वराजा ज्ञानेन्द्रका अंगरक्षकद्वारा पत्रकारमाथि दुव्र्यवहार, १७ जना घाइते
All News    
Nepali Samachar
National
Sports
Political
World
Entertainment
Business
Travel
::| ADVERTISEMENT
::| Newsletter
Your Name:
Your Email:
 
 

Kelly speaks at child porn trial, won't testify

Thursday, 06.12.2008, 01:51am (GMT+5.5)

CHICAGO (AP) - R. Kelly told the judge in his child pornography trial Tuesday that he doesn't plan to testify.

After Judge Vincent Gaughan told Kelly he had a right to not take the stand, the R&B singer leaned forward at the defense table with his hands folded and, speaking for the first time at the trial, responded: "I decided not to testify."

The jury wasn't in the room at the time.

Kelly, 41, has pleaded not guilty to charges that he videotaped himself having sex with an underage girl. Both Kelly and the alleged victim, now 23, have denied being on the tape.

Also Tuesday, the judge ruled that jurors can view the sex tape once they begin deliberating.

Kelly's lawyers had asked the judge to bar jurors from reviewing the graphic video, saying they worried jurors would overemphasize one piece of evidence. But prosecutors argued the tape is the primary subject of the trial and couldn't be kept from jurors.

"People's Exhibit No. 1 is the actual nucleus of the case ... the evidence centers around this exhibit," said prosecutor Shauna Boliker.

Gaughn agreed, but added that he would instruct the jurors before they begin deliberating that they shouldn't put too much emphasis on the tape alone.

A prosecution witness also took the stand for a second time to rebut defense claims about the tape. The defense and prosecution both have rested their cases but video expert Grant Fredericks' testimony is part of the prosecution's right of rebuttal.

A version of the video that the defense used in presenting their case was misleading because it was such low quality, Fredericks told jurors.

The defense argued that in their version of the tape there is no mole on the back of the man who appeared, proving the man is not Kelly, who has such a mole.

But Fredericks says higher quality versions of the tape clearly show a mole on the man's back.

The defense and prosecutors also sparred in court Tuesday about who made certain copies of the tape and whether that may have undermined the defense's case.

Closing arguments are likely to be delivered Thursday.

aol.com

Comments (0)        Print        Tell friend        Top


Other Articles
 
::| SEARCH
Keyword:  
   
    [Advance Search]
::| ADVERTISEMENT
::| Events
July 2010  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
 
::|Hot News
Carrie Underwood Says She's Not Sexy
BAGAICHA.COM
© Copyright 2008. www.bagaicha.com, All Rights Reserved.